Why might Two scientists develop different hypotheses based on the same observations?

Why might Two scientists develop different hypotheses based on the same observations?

Why might two scientists develop different hypotheses based on the same observations? Interpretations are based on many factors, including previous studies the scientist has conducted. A hypothesis is a solution based on previous knowledge, so it is an educated guess.

Why are both types of observations important to scientist?

Scientists gather information by making both qualitative and quantitative observations. Qualitative observations yield descriptive, nonnumerical results. Quantitative observations yield meaningful, numerical results.

What do hypotheses theories and laws have in common data?

Answer and Explanation: One major factor that a scientific hypothesis, theory, and law have in common is that they are all based on observations.

Why is repetition and replication important in science?

Getting the same result when an experiment is repeated is called replication. Replication is important in science so scientists can “check their work.” The result of an investigation is not likely to be well accepted unless the investigation is repeated many times and the same result is always obtained.

What are the two types of observation give two example for each type of observation?

The two categories of observations are quantitative and qualitative. Quantitative observations involve numeric data, such as a frequency count. Quantitative observations tend to be very objective, as there is often no judgement involved. For example, a child is either speaking or she isn’t.

How do scientific observations differ from everyday observations?

Answer: Scientific observation is rationalized with experiments with a key factor, while day-to-day observation is not focussed on any key factor. Explanation: Scientific observation requires focus on nature, formulation and testing a hypothesis.

What is the purpose of multiple trials in an experiment?

When we do experiments it’s a good idea to do multiple trials, that is, do the same experiment lots of times. When we do multiple trials of the same experiment, we can make sure that our results are consistent and not altered by random events.

How does a scientist determine whether the hypothesis is correct?

Based on the observations he or she made, the scientist has to determine whether the hypothesis was correct. The conclusion of a scientific process is a statement of whether the original hypothesis was supported or refuted by the observations gathered.

What is the difference between an observation and a hypothesis?

Discuss the difference between an observation and a hypothesis. Help students recognize that identifying a hypothesis in an article tells you something about how to think about that statement more critically. Because it isn’t an observation, the reader needs to investigate whether or not the hypothesis was supported by observations.

Why do scientists constantly challenge hypotheses and collect more data?

differentiate between an observation and a hypothesis and apply that understanding to new information explain that scientists constantly challenge hypotheses, which can force them to make more observations and collect more data, helping them to reject some hypotheses and further strengthen others

What are the two types of observations in scientific method?

The scientific method has following steps, plus one feedback step: There are two types of observations namely subjective and objective. Subjective observations are based on personal opinions and beliefs and hence can vary from person to person. Hence Subjective observations are not in the realm of science.