Admin Table of Contents [hide]
Why is Wiki and blog not a reliable source?
Wikipedia can be edited by anyone at any time. This means that any information it contains at any particular time could be vandalism, a work in progress, or just plain wrong. Wikipedia generally uses reliable secondary sources, which vet data from primary sources. …
What are reliable sources for Wikipedia?
Wikipedia articles should be based mainly on reliable secondary sources, i.e., a document or recording that relates or discusses information originally presented elsewhere. Reputable tertiary sources, such as introductory-level university textbooks, almanacs, and encyclopedias, may be cited.
Is Wikipedia a reliable source of health information?
“Don’t use Wikipedia for medical advice,” warns The Independent after a survey found factual errors in 9 out of 10 articles about the 10 most common medical conditions.
Why is a wiki or blog not a good source of information for research paper?
Why is a blog an unreliable source? In general, blogs are considered unreliable scholarly sources because many are strongly opinionated and can lack the professionalism expected in a scholarly source.
Is Wikipedia reliable journal?
The online encyclopedia does not consider itself to be a reliable source and discourages readers from using it in academic or research settings. Researchers, teachers, journalists, and public officials do not regard Wikipedia as a reliable source.
Is Wikipedia reliable for medical students?
In conclusion, despite the effort placed in creating Wikipedia respiratory articles by anonymous volunteers (wikipedians), most articles had knowledge deficiencies, were not accurate, and were not suitable for medical students as learning resources.
Why is Wikipedia a bad source?
Wikipedia is not a “bad” source, they are not really a source at all. Rather Wikipedia is a collection of sources, of which all attribution is (or should be) attributed to. If you want to source Wikipedia, just check the reference they are using and use that.
Why is Wikipedia an unreliable source?
Wikipedia generally uses reliable secondary sources,which vet data from primary sources.
Is Wikipedia an unreliable source?
Wikipedia is an unreliable source because regular, everyday people are the people who are writing the articles. Therefore, some of the information the put up may come out as wrong, unreal, and / or biased. This is the reason why Wikipedia is an unreliable source.
How credible is wikipedia?
There is no guarantee that the information that is credible. Wikipedia admits that not everything on their website is “accurate, comprehensive, or unbiased” (source). Wikipedia does not employ a process of peer review, as all academic journals do with their articles prior to publication.