What was the main argument of the federalists that supported the new Constitution?

What was the main argument of the federalists that supported the new Constitution?

Federalists argued for counterbalancing branches of government. In light of charges that the Constitution created a strong national government, they were able to argue that the separation of powers among the three branches of government protected the rights of the people.

What did the Anti-Federalists argue for?

Anti-Federalists argued that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal government, while taking too much power away from state and local governments. Many felt that the federal government would be too far removed to represent the average citizen.

Which argument would an anti-federalist?

What were the main arguments used by the Anti-Federalists in the debate?

The main arguments used by the Anti-Federalists in the debate for the U.S. Constitution were the fact that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal government and that the rights of the people were not guaranteed through a Bill of Rights.

Why did some Antifederalists drop their objections to the Constitution?

Some Antifederalists dropped their objections to the Constitution when they were promised that a Bill of Rights would be added. In 1791 that Bill of Rights was ratified, in the form of the first ten amendments to the Constitution. The amendments that have provoked the most controversy in recent history are the First, Second, Ninth, and Tenth.

Who wrote articles against the ratification of the Constitution?

Many of the Anti-Federalists wrote articles against the ratification under pseudonyms such as Centinel, Brutus and Federal Farmer. Some of them came forward publicly against the ratification, an example being Patrick Henry.

How did the ratification debate lead to disagreements over the Constitution?

The ratification debate led to disagreements between the Federalists, who wanted to ratify the Constitution, and Anti-Federalists, who opposed the document. The latter believed that the new system imposed by the Constitution failed to protect the individual rights of citizens and threatened liberties.