Admin Table of Contents
- 1 What was the argument for kuhlmeier?
- 2 Who was the respondent in Hazelwood v Kuhlmeier?
- 3 What did Hazelwood argue?
- 4 Why is Hazelwood v Kuhlmeier an important case?
- 5 Why is Hazelwood v Kuhlmeier a landmark case?
- 6 What did Principal Reynolds say was wrong with the article about divorce?
- 7 Why was the Hazelwood v Kuhlmeier case important?
What was the argument for kuhlmeier?
Dismayed by the school’s decision, three of the student journalists, including editor Cathy Kuhlmeier, pursued their case in the courts, arguing that the school had violated their First Amendment right of free speech.
Who was the respondent in Hazelwood v Kuhlmeier?
Louis County, Missouri; various school officials; Robert Eugene Reynolds, the principal of Hazelwood East High School; and Howard Emerson, a teacher in the school district. Respondents are three former Hazelwood East students who were staff members of Spectrum, the school newspaper.
When was the Hazelwood v Kuhlmeier case?
January 13, 1988
Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier/Dates decided
What did Hazelwood argue?
In Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier, 484 U.S. 260 (1988), the Supreme Court held that schools may restrict what is published in student newspapers if the papers have not been established as public forums.
Why is Hazelwood v Kuhlmeier an important case?
Kuhlmeier et al., 484 U.S. 260 (1988), was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that held that public school curricular student newspapers that have not been established as forums for student expression are subject to a lower level of First Amendment protection than independent student …
Can a principal censor a school newspaper?
Kuhlmeier, the high court ruled that school officials can censor school-sponsored publications if their decision is “reasonably related to a legitimate pedagogical purpose.” This means school officials must show that they have a reasonable educational reason for censoring the material.
Why is Hazelwood v Kuhlmeier a landmark case?
What did Principal Reynolds say was wrong with the article about divorce?
What did Principal Reynolds say was wrong with the article about divorce? Principal Reynolds was concerned that a father who was criticized was not given the opportunity to respond to the accusations made against him in the article.
What happened in Mapp v Ohio?
Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the exclusionary rule, which prevents prosecutors from using evidence in court that was obtained by violating the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, applies not only to the federal government but also to …