How did the Cold War developed between 1945 and 1953?

How did the Cold War developed between 1945 and 1953?

The Cold War began after the surrender of Nazi Germany in 1945, when the uneasy alliance between the United States and Great Britain on the one hand and the Soviet Union on the other started to fall apart. The Americans and the British worried that Soviet domination in eastern Europe might be permanent.

What factors divided the US and the Soviet Union?

Relations between the Soviet Union and the United States were driven by a complex interplay of ideological, political, and economic factors, which led to shifts between cautious cooperation and often bitter superpower rivalry over the years.

Why did the second cold war start?

The Second Cold War began to unfold in the late 1970s and continued into the 1980s. It marked the end of Détente, which had produced arms reduction treaties and better relations. 2. Two contributing factors were the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan and the election of Ronald Reagan in 1980.

Why was the period between 1946 and 1990 known as the Cold War?

As World War II was ending, the Cold War began. This was to be a long lasting and continuing confrontation between the Soviet Union and the United States, lasting from 1945 to 1989. It was called the Cold War because neither the Soviet Union nor the United States officially declared war on each other.

What is the difference between a feature and a component?

Features are those behaviors of the system that directly fulfill some user need; Components are distinguishable system parts that provide and encapsulate common functions needed to implement features; Agile’s continuous delivery emphasizes features (and constituent stories) that solve user needs and

Can a feature team complete a feature by itself?

But a feature team can complete a feature by itself. Features can be too big to be consumed by one Agile team and may ultimately require stories from multiple feature teams. In addition, the very notion of a feature or component team is a bit simplistic, as many teams have responsibilities for both.

Why do we need cooperation between component teams?

A majority of system features create dependencies that require cooperation between component teams to build, deploy, and ultimately release. Teams spend much of their time discussing dependencies between teams and testing behavior across components rather than being able to deliver end user value.

When does it make sense to create a component team?

Modifications by others are likely made after a conversation with the component team. It can make sense to create a component team when a component: The big disadvantage to the component organization is obvious: it slows value flow.