Why did the Supreme Court rule in Gratz v Bollinger that the University of Michigan use of racial preferences violate the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment?

Why did the Supreme Court rule in Gratz v Bollinger that the University of Michigan use of racial preferences violate the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment?

We conclude, therefore, that because the University’s use of race in its current freshman admissions policy is not narrowly tailored to achieve respondents’ asserted compelling interest in diversity, the admissions policy violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Why did the Court strike down the University of Michigan’s system of undergraduate admissions in Gratz v Bollinger?

The Court struck down the UM undergraduate admissions system in Gratz because it mechanically awarded all minority applicants a similar bonus. The Court upheld the UM law school system because it ostensibly granted racial preferences on a case by case basis.

What did the Court rule in the case Grutter v Bollinger 2003 )? Quizlet?

In a 5-4 opinion delivered by Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, the Court held that the Equal Protection Clause does not prohibit the Law School’s narrowly tailored use of race in admissions decisions to further a compelling interest in obtaining the educational benefits that flow from a diverse student body.

What was the decision in Gratz v Bollinger?

Bollinger was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the University of Michigan undergraduate affirmative action admissions policy. In a 6-3 decision announced on June 23, 2003, the Supreme Court ruled that the university’s point system was too mechanistic and therefore unconstitutional.

What was the Supreme Court’s decision in Grutter v Bollinger?

Bollinger (2003), the Supreme Court ruled that the use of affirmative action in school admission is constitutional if it treats race as one factor among many, its purpose is to achieve a “diverse” class, and it does not substitute for individualized review of applicant, but is unconstitutional if it automatically …

What happened in Gratz v Bollinger?

What was decided about affirmative action in Gratz v Bollinger?

Bollinger, a case decided by the United States Supreme Court on June 23, 2003, upheld the affirmative action admissions policy of the University of Michigan Law School. The decision permitted the use of racial preference in student admissions to promote student diversity.

What did the Gratz v Bollinger case do?

What was the Supreme Court decision in Grutter v Bollinger?

What was the result of Smith v Allwright?

Allwright, 321 U.S. 649 (1944), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court with regard to voting rights and, by extension, racial desegregation. It overturned the Texas state law that authorized parties to set their internal rules, including the use of white primaries.

What is the significance of Gratz v Bollinger?

Gratz v. Bollinger. Gratz v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 244 (2003), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the University of Michigan undergraduate affirmative action admissions policy. In a 6–3 decision announced on June 23, 2003, Chief Justice Rehnquist, writing for the Court, ruled the University’s point system’s “predetermined point…

What was the Supreme Court decision in the Bollinger v Michigan case?

Bollinger, 539 U.S. 244 (2003), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the University of Michigan undergraduate affirmative action admissions policy. In a 6–3 decision announced on June 23, 2003, Chief Justice Rehnquist, writing for the Court, ruled the University’s point system’s “predetermined point allocations”…

What was the case against the University of Michigan?

The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan against the University of Michigan, the College of LSA, James Duderstadt, and Lee Bollinger. Duderstadt was president of the university while Gratz’s application was under consideration, and Bollinger while Hamacher’s was under consideration.

What was the outcome of the grutz v Michigan case?

At trial, the court found that the University of Michigan’s policy was discriminatory treatment and issued an injunction. The University appealed to the court of appeals. The court of appeals denied the injunction and reversed the decision of the lower court. Grutz and Hamacher petitioned to the United States Supreme Court.